Seven - Paradox and Selfless Action
Thursday, August 31st, 2006Lao Tsu’s seventh chapter is largely opaque to me; that is, I find it difficult to penetrate the poetry to reach some understanding of the list of paradoxes that begin the chapter. We have heaven and earth lasting forever because they are unborn and the sage or master staying behind and so at the fore. But then we are given two apparent paradoxes that I do think I understand. They are familiar tenets of Buddhism, as well:
“The master is detached, thus at one with all. Through selfless action, he attains fulfillment.”
Let’s begin with detachment. Here is a central idea in Sakyamuni Buddha’s Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. The Middle Way is a roadmap to the detachment that will end suffering (dukkha). When we are free of our grasping nature we will experience the the Truth of our oneness with all Being. Thus the Middle Way is a loss of self and the concommitant realization of Self. Little self and Big Self. “The master is detached, thus at one with all.”
“Through selfless action, he attains fulfillment.” Having spent nine years of my life being educated by Jesuits, this very Buddhist principle was drilled into me daily. Of course, many traditions teach this principal, but I am grateful to the Jesuits for making this ideal an integral part of my character. As we were told at Jesuit High School in New Orleans, the highest goal was to be “A Man for Others.” This principle has always struck me as more than just a truth; it is indeed The Truth. If one lives one’s life with this Truth as a guiding principle for one’s action (ignore the sexist language above, it was a boys school, after all), one will have had a life worth living.
Consider the principle of Selfless Action in contrast to the standpoint of Neo-Conservatism in the United States and the vapid biological and psychological interpretations of “enlightened selfishness” that underlie it. If we are to believe these fuckers, it is impossible for the human animal to act altruistically. Altruistic actions only appear so because the benefits to the self may not be first order effects; nevertheless, the benefits to the self are actually the driving purpose for actions which appear altruistic, we are to believe. They are part of a kind selfish calculus which the human animal applies in order to benefit itself at every turn.
Selflessness flies in the face of the atomistic individualism that suffuses our popular culture in the United States. The Middle Way is not in its essence a theory about the nature of reality; instead it is a form of practice. A Way of Life in a very strong sense. I am willing to live without metaphysics or ontology propping up the Buddha’s Path. It is enough for me to know in my heart that this Way should be my way. For what if I was wrong, and I had lived my life in the constant effort to walk the Buddha’s Path? Such would be a life I could look back on proudly.
in the first stanza, but the original is closer to “straw dogs.” Taken together, these terms help us to see what is meant more clearly. Sub specie aeternitatis. As Spinoza taught, under the aspect of eternity, temporal accidents can never be confused with Being. The trick is achieving that point of view. Clearly, such a view would be a side effect of a deeper achievement and not merely a shift in perspective.
So early in the text and we have run up against a truly alien standpoint to our everyday American sensibilities. In Chapter Two we had our first hint of
7 that was written and directed by Gillian Anderson (who plays Scully) called “All Things.” You can get some details on the episode at